In this section can be found, in their entirety, decisions rendered by FIBA Appeal Commission on cases to which WADA was a party.

• FIBA AC 2007-2, WADA v. FIBA & Kambala
• FIBA AC 2005-6, WADA v. FIBA & Kurtoglu
• FIBA AC 2005-5, N’Sima & WADA v. FIBA
• FIBA AC 2005-1, WADA v. FIBA & Morgan

USADA publishes on its site, in an exhaustive manner, decisions pertaining to the organization and anti-doping, rendered not only by CAS but also by the American Association of Arbitration (AAA). The cases concerning Tim Montgomery, Chryste Gaines, Tyler Hamilton and Torri Edwards can be found among these.

USADA Arbitration Decisions
 

SDRCC publishes decisions applying the Canadian anti-doping program, which is in compliance with the World Anti-Doping Code.

SDRCC Jurisprudence Database

The Tribunal’s site allows the consultation of decisions rendered, including those relating to anti-doping rule violations.

Sports Tribunal of New Zealand Decisions

ITF posts online all of the decisions made by its anti-doping tribunal.

ITF Decisions

FINA posts online most of the sanctions rendered by its anti-doping panel.

FINA Antidoping Cases

FEI posts online all of the decisions made by its judicial committee, as well as CAS decisions related to FEI.

Athlete Anti-Doping Decisions

Below are decisions (in French) rendered by the FILA Appeal Panel for doping cases to which WADA was a party.
 

• WADA v. FILA & Boyadzhiev
• WADA v. FILA & FRIS
• WADA v. FILA & Gazimagomedov  
• WADA v. FILA & Petkovic

In this section can be found, in their entirety, decisions rendered by the CONI tribunal for doping (G.U.I) on cases to which WADA was a party.

• CONI T.N.A. no 44/09, WADA v. FGI & Gaddi
• CONI T.N.A. no 90/08, WADA v. FISI & Deflorian
• CONI G.U.I no 17/08 WADA v. FIGC & Lupacchio
• CONI G.U.I no 07/08 WADA v. FIT & Gambi
• CONI G.U.I no 04/08 WADA v. FIGC & Lanotte
• CONI G.U.I no 19/07 WADA v. FIR & Formigoni
• CONI G.U.I no 18/07 WADA v. FPI & Comastri
• CONI G.U.I no 16/07 WADA v. FPA & Balestri
• CONI G.U.I no 16/07 WADA v. FPA & Indaco
   

In this section can be found, in their entirety, decisions rendered by the Flemish Disciplinary Council on cases to which WADA was a party.

• 2008-113, WADA v. Flemish Disciplnary Committee and Kopp
• 2008-113, WADA v. Flemish Disciplnary Committee and Kopp (English translation)

In this section can be found decisions rendered by the Appeals Commission of the Puerto Rico Anti-doping Commission on cases to which WADA was a party.

• WADA v. Anti-doping Panel of the Puerto Rico Anti-Doping Commission & Ortiz

In this section can be found, in their entirety, decisions rendered by the Appeals Commission of the Romanian Anti-doping Agency on cases to which WADA was a party.

• WADA v. Sobota
• WADA v. Muresan
• WADA v. Toma
• WADA v. Trifan
   

Anti-Doping Appeal Tribunal of South Africa

• WADA v. Van Jaarsveld & SAIDS

Cologne Regional Court (Germany)

• Lagat v. WADA & IAAF

Swiss Federal Tribunal

• Stadnyk & AWF v. WADA & FILA
• Turrini v. WADA & CISM
• Busch v. WADA
• Busch v. WADA (English version) 
• Ricardo Dodô v. FIFA, WADA & CAS
• Nuno Assis v. WADA
• Hondo v. WADA, UCI, Swiss Cycling, Swiss Olympic and Chambre des recours du Tribunal cantonal du Canton de Vaud
• Valverde v. CONI, WADA & UCI (4A_644/2009)
• Valverde v. CONI, WADA & UCI (4A_234/2010)
• Valverde v. WADA, UCI & RFEC (4A_386/2010)
• Valverde v. WADA, UCI and RFEC (4A_420/2010)

In this section can be found decisions rendered by the Irish Sport Anti-Doping Panel on cases to which WADA was a party.

• WADA v. ISADP & McHale